New Delivery System for Vaccines?

A thought crossed my mind when reading the report below. I had no corroboration for it, so I kept it to myselfâuntil now.
âinsoluble and indigestible macromolecule that reacts to the protein assay, but cannot be recognized by any protein databases.â
https://www.corvelva.it/speciali-corvelva/analisi/vaccingate-initial-results-on-infanrix-hexa-chemical-composition.html
[no longer exists so look here]:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/128CfYaaJdMwhx5yvCGDRggl5GIKyfWrC/view
âIn Infanrix Hexa we found:
chemical contamination from the manufacturing process or cross-contamination with other manufacturing lines; chemical toxins; bacterial peptide toxins; insoluble and indigestible macromolecule that reacts to the protein assay, but cannot be recognized by any protein databases.
Update 2020: I contacted an acquaintance who is a scientist. I questioned the origin of the macromolecule's design pointing him to this article I wrote in 2018. He told me he would be seeing a member of the Corvelva team in a few days. He never addressed my query again, but I see Corvelva added the following to the above paragraph in their paper.
"We have found instead a real polymer, insoluble and indigestible, that we supposed to be the set of antigens chemically bound together (has to be defined if this is present as an aggregate of the individual antigens or a single macromolecule), on which we can find in literature partial information regarding the single antigens."
To my way of thinking, it is an experimental DNA origami.

We have not found:
Protein antigens of diphtheria toxoids, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, haemophylus influenzae B, Poliomyelitis 1-2-3; Formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde, phenoxyethanol, antibiotic residues indicated in the composition; In Infanrix Hexa there are six antigensâ
MIT worked on a transport package for the hexavalent vaccine. Is this the reason no antigens were found was that they are in that macromolecule? I wonder if the macromolecule is the transport?
Now donât get me wrong. MITâs work is astounding. The ramifications of such a delivery system could have many usesâsome beyond what we can even dream about. Itâs exciting to see technology moving ever forwardâbut it must be with safety in mind.
MeanwhileâI saw a short clip buried in a youtube discussion of MITâs work in creating the packages. Itâs only a few seconds, and it informs you that your baby can get one or two years of vaccines. What if your baby has a reaction to the first round? or the second? or the third? Youâll be told itâs a coincidence or itâs normal for your child to have raging fevers or febrile seizures or both.
https://www.bloglovin.com/@joycebowen1Articles from Joyce đ Bowen Brand Ambassador @ beBee
View blog
I first wrote an article on Dodd-Frank last year. · It was a cursory piece to let people know that w ...

Introduction by Joyce Bowen · There are times you just canât do it any better than it has already be ...

I have a story to tell. · We all do. · I sought to live a life of obscurity. · Iâve always downplaye ...
Related professionals
You may be interested in these jobs
-
Principal Scientist
1 month ago
BioSpace Englewood, NJWe are hiring a Principal Scientist with a deep background in peptide-based vaccine development, cancer immunology and immuno-oncology. · ...
- Edwards Lifesciences Irvine
Imagine how your ideas and expertise can change a patient's life. Our Global Operations & Quality team plays a central part in ensuring our products are delivered to patients with cardiovascular disease. · Build and maintain strong partnerships with R&D, Program Management, Manuf ...
-
Vaccine Coordinator-Baseline
1 month ago
Mountain Park Health Center PhoenixThe Vaccine Coordinator ensures vaccine administration remains in compliance with federal and state regulations and oversees vaccine supply including but not limited to ordering, receiving, storing, monitoring temperature. · Folloows and implements the system wide program for the ...
Comments
Joyce đ Bowen Brand Ambassador @ beBee
5 years ago#2
They don't use saline placebos anymore. They say it's unethical. But placebo studies are supposed to prove safety--they are perverting such a thing to mean efficacy. In any vaccine study [and for decades, too] another vaccine or a toxic adjuvant is used. Then--voila!--the same or a similar number of deaths or damages people in the control and the test groups ensues. That must make it safe. For the most part, the world that calls it scientific [these days] is fraught with Frankensteins--only they are not waiting until the bodies are dead.
Zacharias đ Voulgaris
5 years ago#1