It's elementary my dear Watson
It's elementary my dear Watson
Deducing the difference between one thing and another. Some are very easy; a car is not ice cream. Others can be rather more difficult to deduce; medium rare and medium (at least in many of the restaurants I have been to). Therefore, learning to evaluate and investigate are essential tools and skills to learn as we progress through life if indeed, we do desire to know the difference between objects. And perhaps even more valuable is the difference or lack thereof between ideas.
One reason we might desire to learn how to know if two things are indeed two different things or in fact, simply one thing seen from a new angle is a clearer or more accurate perception of our world. Again, we could be discussing ideas as well as physical objects. Understanding what we are talking about or looking at is valuable if indeed we have a desire to interact with others or to simply recognize what we are seeing.
When two or more people desire to communicate it is essential for them to be on the same proverbial page. If I am describing a car but the person, I am talking with believes we are looking at a plane we might have a few miscommunications and some significant confusion.
To communicate well it is essential to make no assumptions about the person listening but instead to ensure that both of you are truly on the same page. Added to that communication only happens well when one is sure that a distinction between two things exists if indeed, they are two different things.
Confirmation of our perception and then perhaps the ability to communicate that perception is vital if we desire to understand where we are in our world and what is transpiring around us. Or I expect we could simply make stuff up as we go. That too could be fun!
Blessings.
in Café beBee and in 1 more group
Articles from Greg Rolfe
View blogFiddling as the world burns · There are days that can feel like we are Caesar fiddling while Rome bu ...
Fact fiction opinion · This morning I was watching a few short videos and read a number of posts jus ...
Why do what you do? · For example, myself. I tend to write. Now to be honest I used to believe I wro ...
Related professionals
You may be interested in these jobs
-
Athletic Trainer
Found in: Lensa US P 2 C2 - 1 day ago
Orthopedic Institute of Pennsylvania Camp Hill, United StatesJob Type · Full-time · Description · At the Orthopedic Institute of PA, our mission since 1971 has been to create an amazingly positive, memorable experience for every patient, family, and team member. We treat each other with crazy courtesy and exceptional empathy and work tog ...
-
UX Copywriter
Found in: beBee S2 US - 3 weeks ago
TEKsystems Chicago, United States ContractLooking for talented and experience UX Copywriters for our fortune 500 clients We have seen openings for clients that sit within industries like retail, financial services, healthcare and more. · If you have at least 3 years of applicable UX writing experience and enterprise exp ...
-
Controller/Office Manager
Found in: beBee S2 US - 1 week ago
I 5 Exteriors Inc. Vancouver, United States Full timeWe are currently seeking a detail-oriented and highly organized individual to join our team as a Controller/Office Manager in the construction industry. As the Controller/Office Manager, you will play a crucial role in managing the day-to-day operations of our office and ensuring ...
Comments
Greg Rolfe
1 year ago #8
John, I know I responded to your scratching comment days ago. But according to this, it was never posted. I believe my response was something along the idea of digging is hard work and scratching gives the appearance without the effort.
John Rylance
1 year ago #7
Too many people scratching the surface of things like headless chickens, not able to see what's below the surface
Greg Rolfe
1 year ago #6
Alas Pascal you are correct. Looking deep might just be a lost art.
Pascal Derrien
1 year ago #5
Depth is long gone too time consuming for many….
Greg Rolfe
1 year ago #4
First off amazing illustration! And your point is dead on in my opinion. Good communication is very hard and indeed is getting worse. I love commentaries as they give me a different perspective of a passage. Some of these are so shallow as to be a dried-up creek bed assuming I know the entirety of the passage and are simply giving me the “point”. While others are so complex in their depth that I become physically tired of reading through the explanation. (Simply proving I am not as much of a scholar as I had hoped or believed.) Though in either case what they intended to communicate was lost. Finding that balance is an art as you accurately said. One I must learn to find myself. Have a great day @Ken Boddie!
Ken Boddie
1 year ago #3
You got me thinking with this one, Greg. The art of good communication is, I believe, dying, and the downward trend is being propagated by a combination of texting, diminishing attention spans associated with SM, and inadequate English teaching at schools. That being stated, the provision of clear and intelligible information can be a balancing act between treating your subjects as totally uninformed on one hand or very knowledgable on the other. Classic examples of the latter are often to be found in some inadequately informative manuals, the writing of which would appear to be an art form in itself. BTW, Greg, I’ve heard it said that good communication should be like a mini-skirt; long enough to cover the essentials, and short enough to keep everyone’s attention. 🤗
Greg Rolfe
1 year ago #2
Exactly Sir!
Jim Murray
1 year ago #1
Excellent point. Too many people in the world look at just the surface, and often draw wrong conclusions from that. When just going a little deeper would get them closer to reality,.