Zacharias 🐝 Voulgaris

1 month ago · 3 min. reading time · visibility ~100 ·

chat Contact the author

thumb_up Relevant message Comment

Can We Transcend Binary Thinking?

Dt dada dg — ura w —uth
HO =0O0=O=O=O= TOmOO~TO~O=0
PY T-Totadd ddd ddd d= Lol Tye
RIESE r= rr id
DITOR eee Y_% : BLY
PY = = beg,
JIVE 1 Epebodpnliy dyn el Y= VY
PO gota RT
el cof TPS mag | Oa ON
rr pig Ye
[4 BT Eo =
DR i TC Sy BG
+ o

le

           

: 25 522 e%oco-
Cs Ear be eg
re Shue. Jv NP
> i GE Sooo gue 4
Ln EE id
CE rr Pee)
SI8es sess A]

8 ER ye or
B Dband LTT TREE =r TL
O00 —~—~ooo~o ooo —O
JAS- sd Amvhd

phil To EE YE Yee Y Ee EY Ed
Source: pixabay.com 

“While binary behaviour is simple to detect life has become more complicated and complex because of it.” – Pascal Derrien.

 

Problem Description

Someone could read the above quote and not make much out of it. After all, we tend to focus on quotes of historical celebrities, usually associated with impressive accomplishments and such. Everyone else isn't worth paying attention to, or so we are told. This acute observation of that quote, however, hits the nail in the head, when it comes to today's world. There is no doubt that we have many problems, some more urgent than others. The news makes everything sound like the most important thing ever, sucking our attention to the latest and most impressive developments, some of which we'd probably never taken time to read about if we were to use a more conventional medium for being up-to-date. All that, however, is but the surface, the collection of symptoms that reflect a deeper problem, namely, binary thinking.

OK, but we're wired to think in binary terms, right? Isn't that why we make computers using this kind of mentality, to reflect our own? Well, that's debatable. Although binary logic dominates, it's not the only mode of operation for our minds, even if it suits computers perfectly. After all, computers don't interact with the world as much as we do, often amplifying our deeds through machines, which also follow the same thinking pattern. And that's fine when it comes to Math when things tend to be black and white, but what about everything else? Does everything have to be this way or the other?

“Only a Sith deals in absolutes.” – Obi-Wan Kenobi (Star Wars).

 

Common Repercussions

The repercussions of this kind of thinking are immense and borderline catastrophic (at least for most of us). This polarized approach to the world tends to turn it into a black-and-white facsimile of itself, distorting it to its core. Centuries ago, before this way of thinking had become the norm, people would still disagree but wouldn't be as polarized. There were people, for example, who believed in one particular religious dogma without seeing everyone else as the ultimate incarnation of evil. People in Constantinople (modern-day Istanbul), for example, used to harbor entirely different religious views and still get along. Nowadays, such cohabitation would be next-to-impossible, no matter how open-minded the citizens of that city are, compared to people from other parts of the country.

In other areas, the problem of binary thinking divides the world in different ways. Even if they are not mortal enemies, people of a particular field might not be able to communicate with other people in that same field, because of their interpretation of a particular phenomenon. Just try to get two physicists to talk to each other, with one championing the multiple-world hypothesis and another one who adheres to a different theory for explaining the dual-slit experiment (which contrary to its name, isn’t binary at all).

In more down-to-earth scenarios, we find people who champion a particular belief system (not religious though) and those who don't ready to declare war on each other, or cancel each other, because of their discord of views on the matter. This situation becomes more acute when the whole matter becomes political, as it often does since, for some individuals, this sort of discord is an asset.

In my field, I've experienced this dichotomy quite a bit, and for years I was convinced that one paradigm of analytics was so superior to the traditional alternative that there was no chance for both of them co-existing in the future. I wonder how many people thought the same way, even if they didn't make their views evident, because they were more hands-on as professionals. Still, this dichotomy has robbed our field of the progress it could have made if people didn't argue as much about which paradigm was better.

 

Potential Solutions

Of course, there are lots of solutions for this matter. From the more communication-related ones, such as the development of more efficient, wholesome, and holistic interactions in the workplace (see D. Amerland's work on this topic), to more hands-on solutions, such as prolonged detox from social media and possibly other forms of polarizing technology. Additional solutions are bound to come about as more people start looking into this matter. Of course, it's easier to talk about the bad than try to build something good or at least research it. What all these solutions have in common is a broader understanding of the problem at hand and the framing of the circumstances in a different, non-binary, manner.

For example, if places like FB stress you out because of their binary approach to things (e.g., either you play ball or your account gets suspended, perhaps even banned), you don't have to stay there. Many citizens of Turkey have fled the country over the years, often risking their lives, after their government followed a similar policy, though more life-threatening. Those people risked their lives to find asylum in other countries because they cared to preserve a different (non-binary) view of things. Many people on FB do the same as they flee to more open-minded platforms. So, if you value an alternative worldview, even if it's not perfect, and wish to do something about it, there are always options. You just need to see them and explore them.

“The world itself doesn't truly change, merely the eyes of the people who look at it do." – Anonymous.

 

Going Beyond Said Solutions

The world itself isn't simple, but it doesn't have to be as complicated as it now is. It's quite likely that a lot of this complexity is shallow (and therefore reducible) as it stems from artificial divisions. Solutions to this may help transcend this or the other wall that has been erected among us, but none of these solutions is a silver bullet. Perhaps the more promising way to deal with the issue is by addressing the problem at its root. Namely, shift our perspective to one that can embrace more possibilities, focusing on those that unite us. This way, we can adjust our behavior that helps bring about a simpler (though not simplistic) world, one where we can co-exist more harmoniously.

 

JlKhz.gif
As this symbol of Dynamic Equilibrium suggests, it doesn't have to be a binary choice…

group_work in Spiritual You

thumb_up Relevant message Comment
Comments
Zacharias 🐝 Voulgaris

Zacharias 🐝 Voulgaris

1 month ago #5

Thank you all for your feedback! It's a deep topic and I'm just scratching the surface here. I hope the article inspires you to think about it in deeper ways, more applicable to you. Cheers

Debasish Majumder

Debasish Majumder

1 month ago #4

relevant buzz indeed @Zacharias 🐝 Voulgaris ! enjoyed read and shared. thank you for the buzz.

Jerry Fletcher

Jerry Fletcher

1 month ago #3

Zacharias, binary thinking is a choice. it uses polarization to force conclusions. But we operate in an analog world which is even more shattering for individuals uncomfortable with differences existing side by side or scaling from one to another. Spun fast enough the Yin/Yang symbol becomes grey moving from digital to analog. In my view, those that want to slow things down opt for digital. They are not built for speed. And so it goes.

Pascal Derrien

Pascal Derrien

1 month ago #2

Gosh I feel like an influencer now ( I am joking) first time ever somebody has ever quoted me… thanks for that but more importantly thanks for your post .  A few years a go the big push for the personalization of IT where work and personal life boundaries became blurry have also probably contributed to fuel anger and stigmatisation personally I have reversed and adjusted personas depending on tools on FB its primarily for my sports activity, bebee for writing and LI for work. Its indeed siloed but it works for me and yes I am also economical in what I post and to who …..

Bab Mijieah Eagle

Bab Mijieah Eagle

1 month ago #1

Awesome piece. Thank you🙏

More articles from Zacharias 🐝 Voulgaris

View blog
4 days ago · 3 min. reading time
Zacharias 🐝 Voulgaris

Facebook's Recent Issues and the Need for More Privacy

Source: pixabay.com · Brief Overview of What's Hap ...

2 months ago · 2 min. reading time
Zacharias 🐝 Voulgaris

Censoring Platforms

Source: pixabay.com · This article was inspired by ...

2 months ago · 2 min. reading time
Zacharias 🐝 Voulgaris

Why beBee Rocks Even Harder Now

Source: bebee.comAbout six months ago I wrote an a ...