Fact fiction and the supernatural
Facts fiction supernatural
Belief in the supernatural is easily traced thousands of years into our history. It is only recently that we have come to the conclusion that the supernatural does not exist. We instead hold the belief that all unexplained events are simply science that they were not able to understand.
This change in our beliefs is comforting and brings peace to a troubled mind scared by things that go bump in the night. I actually wonder if we simply changed the way we look at history to wipe away all we do not want to know. Sure, we scoff at the idea that the world is carried on the back of a giant turtle through a cosmic ocean. We smile when discussing the gods of Egypt, Rome, and Greece. We set each aside as an ignorant culture misunderstanding the way the world works.
Then as a whole, we judge each of these cultures as more ignorant than our own. We place our current level of knowledge and discerning at the top of the list. In fact, we pat ourselves on the back pleased with what we see. We have arrived at such an exalted place that we no longer know what a woman is. We have truly arrived. We have surpassed the complex concepts of gender and peace.
We might judge the rest of history as ignorant, but honestly who is proving to be the more ignorant? They blamed the supernatural for things they could not understand and struggled to find answers. We claim to know vast amounts of truths and have ceased to struggle to understand anything. Yet we claim to be superior, the pinacol of achievement.
We might not be a plate sitting on the back of a turtle, but do you understand the mechanics of how our world travels through space? And for those of you who believe they do, where did our world come from? Or how did our moon arrive at the exact distance from our planet to achieve the perfect interaction with our planet to accomplish tides? Now for those who have a decent answer i.e., not aliens placed it there, where did mass come from?
My point is simply this each answer leads to a new question and each question opens up a new area of study. History is not wrong or ignorant. Yes, we might not agree with it. Yes, we might not believe things are controlled by forces we can not see. (Wait, yes, we do.) But we know for a fact that something that is currently beyond our grasp is doing far more than we currently are willing to accept. Which is by definition supernatural. Don’t let the stupid erase the brilliant simply because they use explanations that need work understanding.
Blessings.

in Café beBee
Articles from Greg Rolfe
View blog
Hold it tightly just not too tightly. · "When people care deeply about the same things, when they sh ...

Excitement has left the building · When was the last time you were excited? · The last time you were ...

Finding you balance · When a child is learning to walk, they have this tug of war with gravity. · Th ...
Related professionals
You may be interested in these jobs
-
+At Disney Consumer Products, we inspire imagination around the world and are committed to creating happiness for families and fans by bringing captivating, inspiring, and inclusive products into their daily lives. From toys to t-shirts...+Participate in team IP brainstorm meetin ...
New York, NY1 month ago
-
We are looking for highly skilled Writers who understand how to work within YouTube Automation. · Writing, Giving Notes, Proof Reading and Fact Checking are the main duties · ...
1 month ago
-
A talented writer is needed to craft engaging content for a book project. · ...
2 weeks ago
Comments
Greg Rolfe
3 years ago#5
It is true that if we close our eyes much less light can enter. Sometimes it can be very revealing to step out into the new. But you might want to bring a salt shaker. Have an amazing day Pascal!
Pascal Derrien
3 years ago#4
It would be odd if we knew everything it is likely that there is something beyond our grasp, but since I just believe what I see I will probably never encounter any such ‘’thing''
Ken Boddie
3 years ago#3
I think you’re being too hard on yourself, Greg. Sometimes the best thing we can do is to stir the honey pot, then stand back and see what ensues. BTW, an interesting discussion has evolved in my East or West post, since you last visited.
Greg Rolfe
3 years ago#2
Hi @Ken Boddie, actually the “we” in this was an attempt to use both eastern and western ways of thinking. The vast majority of supernatural thought comes from Eastern mentality. As you mentioned the “logical” deconstruction comes from the Western style of thought. Combining the two ways of thought results in many very interesting concepts. The use of “we” was an attempt (apparently failed), to address the ideas often ignored by the alternate view or way of thinking. What one way of thinking ignores or dismisses is often accepted or at least considered by the other. The largest issue we see is a lack of taking time to address the use of words and actually attempt to understand what is meant by certain phrases not just what words themselves mean. So it seems that this attempt to address this issue was a stunning failure. Oh well, not my first. Thank you Ken!!
Ken Boddie
3 years ago#1
Perhaps, Greg, you might consider being less all encompassing with “we” throughout your argument? It is my experience, based on my travels around this ever decreasing and rapidly more accessible globe of ours, that humanity's beliefs and practices are based on either Western Philosophy, Easter Philosophy, or a clash between both. Western Philosophy (with which you appear to be affiliating, using "we"), has its roots in science and rationale, with heavy use of logic, reasoning and categorisation, focusing on parts rather than the whole; whereas Eastern Philosophy has its roots in religion (e.g. Confucianism, Zen Buddhism, Taoism, Yoga), unifying ideas into a greater whole, and striving for harmony (yin and yang) with an inherent acceptance and without a need to prove. ‘We’ who are enclosed within this Western approach find it exceedingly hard to accept anything that cannot be proven by science, whereas an almost equal proportion of the Eastern Philosophical world has a converse attitude of “seeing is believing”, without any requirement for scientific proof. I expanded upon this comparison in one of my posts way back in 2016, but, as in many of the old posts on this platform, it got corrupted in the recent beBee upgrade. I''ll rework it and repost it soon, so perhaps look out for “East or West, What's Best?”