Susan 馃悵 Rooks, The Grammar Goddess

7 years ago 路 3 min. reading time 路 0 路

Blogging
>
Susan 馃悵 Rooks, blog
>
Wednesday Words: Who and Whom

Wednesday Words: Who and Whom

Brush Up on Your
American Grammar Skills

Grammar Goddess Communication
Look Smart. Sound Smart.

508-238-8664
www. .GrammarGoddess.com
SusanR@GrammarGoddess. com

aGBo

From what I've seen over the 20+ years I've been helping business professionals (re)learn the finer points of American grammar, very few folks know how to use who and whom.

Seriously. You probably do not. So I thought I'd see if a post on just these two words might help.



Directly from my Brush Up on Your American Grammar Skills workbook:

Who and whom follow the basic pronoun rules:聽"Who" is always the subject of a sentence, and "whom" is always the object of the sentence, a verb, or a preposition.

聽Here鈥檚 how you know which to use:聽

  • Always start with the clause (the group of words) following who or whom.聽
  • First, try a simple substitution:聽he for who and him for whom.聽If he fits, use who. If him fits, use whom. (And we use the masculine pronouns because he sounds like who, and him sounds like whom.)
  • If that doesn't help, rewrite the clause to help you see which pronoun to use.

Here are a few examples for you from the workbook -- and yes, there are answers at the bottom.

  • May I tell her (who/whom) is calling?
  • The question of (who/whom) should pay for the cleanup is bothering me!
  • You may vote for (whoever/whomever) appeals to you.
  • You may vote for (whoever/whomever) you wish.
  • (Who/Whom) were you talking to?

The answers are 1=who; 2=who; 3=whoever; 4=whomever; 5: (grammatically = whom; reality = who)

Let's take the first one and substitute he or him for the who/whom: Would you ever say "him is calling"? Nope. You would say "he is calling." Since the pronoun he fits, use who.

The second one is similar: He should pay. Therefore, who should pay is correct.

The third and fourth ones show the reason we always start with the words following who or whom to figure out which to use. In those two sentences, the first four words are the same, but the answer is different.

#3: whoever (he appeals to you).

#4: whomever -- there's no way to substitute he or him in this sentence. But we still start with the words following who/whom -- "You wish" -- and then add them to the first words of the sentence. "You wish you may vote for . . . him."

And #5 flies in the face of all the rules because even if you correctly choose whom, no one will want to talk with you. It will sound odd, pretentious, and just plain weird.

The actual sentence is "Were you talking to him?" So, technically -- grammatically -- we should use whom. But in this case, go with what is typically used, which is who, especially in conversation. No point in weirding anyone out!

I will admit it's easier to talk this through with a group of people than to write it, and I can only hope the explanations here make some sense to you.


And now that you've waded through all that stuff above, here are a couple of "hacks" to help you keep your sanity -- even if you forget everything above.

#1: If you're not sure which to use, use WHO (especially in speech). It's unremarkable. It'll pass without comment. It'll keep conversations flowing. Hardly anyone will even notice.
#2: If the word following who or whom is a verb (an action word or a state of being word), use WHO. The verb needs a subject, and who is the right choice.*
  • Who shoveled the snow? Who was shoveling the snow?
  • Who went to college in LA? Who is going to college in LA?
  • May I tell her who called yesterday? May I tell her who is calling?
  • Who grew up in Boston? Who has grown up in Boston?
  • Who came down the chimney Christmas Eve? Who will be coming down the chimney?
  • Who attended last New Year's Eve party? Who will be at this year's party?
  • Who (maybe) finally understands how to use who and whom?

Otherwise, use whom (but see Hack #1, above).

Simple enough?聽Does this help?聽

*To whom were you talking -- another way of writing/saying that sentence -- is an exception. Whom is correct there (even though it precedes a verb) because it's the object of a preposition (to). But normally, Hack #2 works just fine.

**********

I value your thoughts on this or any of my other posts.

**********

Thanks for taking the time to read this post. I hope you find it relevant, and if it has helped you in any way, I also hope you will ...聽

Share it, so your connections can see it and perhaps learn too.Please tell mewhat you liked best or learned; that will also help you be seen by my connections. You never know who would be interested in聽YOU (just ask Deb Helfrich how well it worked for her!).聽

*********

My previous posts can be seen here,聽and they're easy to find because they're categorized. Just type in a word in the search box on the topic you're looking for and see everything I wrote on it.聽

**********

40bfaf03.jpgDo the associates in your company look and sound as smart as they are?聽They would if they could take one of my聽Brush Up on Your Skills聽workshops right where they work. If your company hires outside experts to teach any topic to its associates, please share my posts and website聽with your Human Resources or Training Manager.聽

Are you a member of an association or other groupthat is looking for a speaker for one of its meetings? There are a lot of communication-based topics that could be perfect for a light-hearted and interesting presentation.聽

I offer聽free聽generic聽Brush Up on Your Skills聽workbooks聽in a pdf format in American grammar, business writing, and interpersonal skills. They show what I teach in my three-hour corporate classes.

Want one? Let me know which one, and please send me your e-mail address.

""
Comments
Hey, Todd Jones! Thanks so much for sharing the post!
When all else fails me, I use Grammerly. It points out the stupid mistakes I make when I forget the rules or cannot really decipher them.
#17
So glad I could help you, Todd Jones!
#9
Oh my yes, Franci\ud83d\udc1dEugenia Hoffman just tickles my funny bone.
#8
Ken Boddie, I always look forward to seeing what you'll write . . . love this one, and thanks for sending me the laugh!
#11
I am NEVER going to agree with could of or should of, John Rylance! NEVAH! Have a wonderful New Year's, and thanks for always commenting on my posts. I really appreciate it.
#5
Many thanks, Jared, for the share and the kind words. Always happy to help!

John Rylance

7 years ago #6

For interest, sad person that I am, I looked up who and whom in my dictionary. (Note to self get a life John) To get to the point it succinctly laid out what Susan explained, finishing with this statement. In modern English there are many speakers who rarely use whom at all, employing who in all contexts; today this use is broadly accepted in standard English. The thin end of the wedge? It will be should have/of, along with would and could have/of next. Where will it end?

Ken Boddie

7 years ago #5

Your owl friend looks very sad and lonely, Susan. I would suggest that he needs a girlfriend, but I fear he may not have the wit to woo. 馃槀

Ken Boddie

7 years ago #4

Perhaps we should look to Whom's Whom for celebrities, Susan? 馃槉

Phil Friedman

7 years ago #3

Great piece, as usual, Susan. Grammar made palatable by filtering out presumption and self-satisfaction. One point, though, if I may. On #5, if one properly rewrites the sentence to "To who/whom were you talking?", not only will one's prose sound better (although perhaps slightly less colloquial) but the who/whom answer will become obvious. Cheers and best wishes for a healthy, happy, prosperous New Year.
John White, MBA, thanks for sharing my post!
#1
@debasish majumder, I am very glad I helped!

Articles from Susan 馃悵 Rooks, The Grammar Goddess

View blog
5 years ago 路 2 min. reading time

Where do you get your ideas for articles? Do you see something, hear something, or react to somethin ...

5 years ago 路 2 min. reading time

I think we all saw the amazing result of the FanDuel Sportsbook's error in posting the odds on a bet ...

4 years ago 路 3 min. reading time

Do you remember being a kid and wanting to grow up and know everything about everything, the way so ...

Related professionals

You may be interested in these jobs

  • Michael Page

    Quality Engineer

    Found in: beBee S2 US - 4 weeks ago


    Michael Page Buffalo Grove, United States Full time

    About Our Client Our client is a global contract manufacturer of medical components with 25+ locations throughout North America. They seek an experienced Quality Engineer, due to growth. 路 6,000 Employees across 25 locations in North America 路 Customers include Medtronic, DePuy, ...

  • RWE

    Blade Repair Services Technician

    Found in: beBee S2 US - 4 weeks ago


    RWE Roscoe, United States

    RWE Clean Energy, LLC 路 Functional area: Operations & Maintenance 路 Remuneration: Non-Exempt 路 RWE Clean Energy represents change, innovation, and sustainability. As one of the world's leading generators of electricity from renewable energy sources, we aim to be carbon-neutral b ...

  • Grant County Schools

    Dry Ridge Elementary Special Education Instructional Assistant

    Found in: Lensa US Remote C2 - 4 days ago


    Grant County Schools United States Remote job

    The Grant County School District is seeking qualified applicants for the position of a Special Education Instructional Assistant at Dry Ridge Elementary for the academic school year. This is a 7.5 hour per day position. 路 Eligible applicants must have ONE of the following: Succe ...