The current atmosphere?
The current atmosphere?
This morning I sampled a variety of tick-tocks, posts, and YouTube shorts just to see what was out there. I made sure I did not just view only one style or agenda-driven message but attempted to honestly spread out what I watched. I viewed comedy, politics, news, and some I am not sure where to place them but one central theme very clearly to the fore. Conflict.
At this point in time, the vast majority of the offerings I am presented with are focused on conflict. A world at war with itself. People looking for a reason to yell at another person. People looking to increase their viewership by attacking another group. What is the end goal?
As a people where do we believe this will end? Or perhaps a better question is how will this end? With conflict raised to the point where it is the goal, where does it end? Or maybe a reasonable question is how does it end? Historically speaking I believe the answer is war. I do not believe that is the agenda of those who are using this increasing level of conflict to farm new “likes”. I think their agenda is simple to gain support for their various channels and platforms. But then what? Have they failed to think ahead? Do they have an end play or plan to transition from conflict to something beneficial?
Yesterday is gone, but its troubles have yet to move on. Why do we continue to give them a place at the table?
Do I think too much? Am I overanalyzing this?
May your day be filled with better thoughts!
Blessings!

in Café beBee
Articles from Greg Rolfe
View blog
Why do what you do? · For example, myself. I tend to write. Now to be honest I used to believe I wro ...

Giving and receiving · Life generally is about giving and receiving. · There are times when we give ...

The power of being nice · We have all most likely heard the saying “nice guys finish last.” Usually ...
Related professionals
You may be interested in these jobs
- The Pennsylvania State University Dallas
Job Title: · Assistant Research Professor · Summary: · The Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science at Penn State announces an opening for a term position focused on measuring ultraviolet radiation from atmospheric electric discharges. The successful candidate will lead ...
-
Atmospheric Scientist
2 days ago
Gridmatic CupertinoJob Description · We are looking for an Atmospheric Scientist to apply their deep expertise to directly influence our models and strategies, contributing to the clean energy transition. This is a hands-on, individual contributor role where you will leverage your scientific knowle ...
- Harvard University Cambridge
Position Overview · The Harvard University Environmental Science and Engineering department is seeking a Ph.D. holder in atmospheric science to work on satellite-based methane emission quantification through inverse analyses, with opportunities to explore global atmospheric chemi ...
Comments
Greg Rolfe
2 years ago#6
“willful ignorance”, that is a great phrase. Perhaps that is a very large part of what I am seeing. Great insight.
Jim Murray
2 years ago#5
I don't think you are over analyzing it. I look around in those same places and a lot of what I see is banality and egotism in the extreme. But I also see a lot more willful ignorance. It's as if people no longer give a shit. It's all about them. This is how authoritarianism takes hold and destroys what little people have left.
Greg Rolfe
2 years ago#4
@Ken Boddie, that is a valid question. From my limited perusal, I believe that yes, the news promotes conflict. I would also anticipate the truth of an increase in conflict in everyday expression and perhaps expectation. The failure in education is a whole nother subject, one which I agree has attributed to the current downward spiral. That topic alone can rase my blood pressure to unhealthy levels. So, at this time I will avoid it. Thank You Ken!
Greg Rolfe
2 years ago#3
@Pascal Derrien, “soul-destroying” is a good expression for a lot of what I see and read. If you find an answer please share!!
Ken Boddie
2 years ago#2
Can’t say I observe conflict as predominant on the SM platforms I trawl through, Greg. I would say that an obvious lack of grammar, writing skills, and often general knowledge, tend to be obvious in people’s interactions these days. These shortcomings often arise, perhaps, through no fault of the platform user, but are propagated by many factors, including a failure in our various education systems. I would suggest that conflict and war tends to be more the chosen subject matter of the news media. We all know that bad news sells best, but are our appetites for it responsible for it’s often unbalanced portrayal in the media, or should our mainstream journalists carry the sole blame? Which came first, the selection of the most shocking stories, or our attraction to reading them at the exclusion of positivity? Are we being sucked into a downward spiral of ‘newsworthy’ negativity or is the world actually becoming more conflicted?
Pascal Derrien
2 years ago#1
a lot of toxic pockets of exacerbated vocal individualism out there I agree I don't have the answer to this, but it is soul destroying at times