Joyce 🐝 Bowen Brand Ambassador @ beBee

3 years ago · 3 min. reading time · 0 ·

Blogging
>
Joyce 🐝 blog
>
Adjuvants: The BBC’s Fairy Dust Future

Adjuvants: The BBC’s Fairy Dust Future

Adjuvants. The BBC's Fairy Dust Future

  

iy ag | rceonee -
recht Fount, Waco by 237% Corvus (tne
Ky Thur tac BC suai sep

  

 

Dna a Gewese,
Re Vous artic ‘imams Response” tis morming

Depie the epproderam heaped oe ka Wilson the govermsment discreetly pad out 64 600
DPT cases withan three years ofthe vaccine dumage payee ct of 573. 1 4 lever ast yeas
£0 BA mich Lapp) | slo rece ot the page by Migoesen which koend that
rtabty = OPT accinsted indus in Genes Bsns (1887 wa § mes acciosted Tht i
0c amd matter

5a pnt cot tht ine compari makes 5 sees whe bing abo) an sche.
ngrvetiene of 3 prestece sd | forward the Bak 0 he cent arvicie by Prof Fey "un
min span i 4 vaccine 4 40 sete €xpoRre 0 shominm”

in ot corre to a5 that there i 0 evince wes thre sevice amd {thnk ye
xg to reccder

Vows pmevrety
on Sn, UX Pi, ge of Ace
The Bester ce 097.
(800 ad eo

Mars Kitaro [1] held oo cee cha 44 res of DF contromersy and ihe UK
Vice mage Poysment Act of 1579 there mere ECO panes 9 the period 3-81
(BRB 34. 1579/3 37. 1890/5 354) [2.9] The rhetoric behind tn fegiiotiin was tht
rss were rane but thas wes Bove out by the record [2.1] The it embed tht
STRIDE 09 FeUirve (he FepuEIEios of The Programme sid adverse pubBcRy by
Intro by Joyce Bowen

I know first hand the devastation wrought by these things. My oldest received three sets of oral Polio and the DPT by the age of 4 months and two days. I rue the day I placed my trust in that pediatrician.  Dr. Christopher Exley is a hero both for children and for parents affected by these ingredients.

d9d14ce3.jpg

Adjuvants: The BBC’s Fairy Dust Future

by John Stone

77c1bef6.jpg.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Click below to read more:

https://www.ageofautism.com/2020/10/adjuvants-the-bbcs-fairy-dust-future.html

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Professor Christopher Exley’s response:

Dear Zaria,

This not about whether one ‘likes’ something or not. It is about your integrity as a journalist.

You contacted me by email to ask my advice. I was happy to help and even gave you my home telephone number since you wished to talk to me personally and not simply correspond by email.

We talked for about forty minutes. I shared with you a great deal of scientific, published, information on our expertise in aluminium adjuvants used in vaccines. I made sure that you had access to all the primary published research that we talked about. I also gave you some background on adjuvants generally. You gave the impression of both being very interested in the information I gave you and also of being grateful for my time and expertise. Afterall we are, arguably, the world’s leading group researching the efficacy and safety of aluminium adjuvants used in vaccines.

When we finished our conversation, you promised to send me a link to your article. You did not do this and reading your article, I can understand why.

Not only did you not mention my contribution to your article once but when opportunities arose you chose to write what can only be described as blatant lies.

For example, even though you knew that what you had written was untrue you still wrote;

There is as little as 0.2mg of aluminium in a typical vaccine dose, which is equivalent to less than the weight of a single poppy seed. There is no evidence that any of the adjuvants currently in use lead to side-effects.

Apart from being factually incorrect the comparison with a poppy seed is absurd at best.

What happened to your editor’s mantra concerning BBC Future;

We believe in truth, facts, and science. We take the time to think. And we don’t accept — we ask why.

I told you everything you needed to know about how much aluminium is used in vaccines. I even shared with you some of our new research in this field about to be published in the BMJ. I pointed out to you that there are serious adverse events caused by aluminium adjuvants and I also informed you as to where you could find this information, no lesser document than the patient information leaflet provided with every vaccine.

Your writing about DPT is completely false and while we did not discuss this you could have checked this information with me at any time. You clearly chose not to check your information.

I told you the story of Glenny and the ‘discovery’ of aluminium adjuvants.

I also made sure that you understood which aluminium salts were used as aluminium adjuvants. Instead you wrote lies again about this;

To this day, the aluminium in vaccines is always in the form of salts. These include aluminium hydroxide (commonly used as an antacid to relieve indigestion and heartburn), aluminium phosphate (often used in dental cement) and potassium aluminium sulphate, which is sometimes found in baking powder.

You decided instead to write complete scientific nonsense in your descriptions of aluminium salts used in vaccines, why is beyond me when you had access to the correct information. What were you trying to do, make the aluminium salts sound benign by comparing them wrongly to household products?

I told you that the main reason why aluminium adjuvants are effective is because they are toxic at the vaccine injection site. I spoke to you at length about this and I pointed you towards the relevant peer reviewed published scientific literature. Your reference to uric acid at this point did not come from me and has no relevance.

This article is very shoddy journalism. It seems to have been primarily informed by a Chinese scientist working on vaccines in China. As the world’s leading researcher on aluminium, I have no knowledge of this scientist only that they have no expertise in aluminium adjuvants. Why you chose to only follow their advice is insulting.

If you and your editors do truly ‘believe in truth, facts, and science’, then I would expect a right of reply to this inaccurate and scientifically inept article. To not do so would suggest that the written lies therein have an alternative agenda.

Yours sincerely

Professor Christopher Exley PhD FRSB

.

Brain Neuron Degeneration

Mercury - University of Calgary Study


Aluminium causes neurofibrillary tangles or amyloid plaques. Its actions are not comparable to the type of destruction Mercury causes. It’s like comparing chalk and cheese [for you Brits] or apples and oranges [for others of us.]


Comments

Articles from Joyce 🐝 Bowen Brand Ambassador @ beBee

View blog
2 years ago · 6 min. reading time

First, A disclaimer—by me. · I know some of you will want to hit me. · I was always pro-choice. · I ...

2 years ago · 3 min. reading time

Okay—so that isn’t the title of the paper, but it should be. · I’ve blocked people from my view for ...

2 years ago · 8 min. reading time

Introduction by Joyce Bowen · There are times you just can’t do it any better than it has already be ...

You may be interested in these jobs

  • RAYUS Radiology

    Front Office

    Found in: Lensa US P 2 C2 - 5 days ago


    RAYUS Radiology Chesterfield, United States

    RAYUS Radiology, formerly Center for Diagnostic Imaging and Insight Imaging, is looking for a Front Office Associate to join our team. We are challenging the status quo by shining light on radiology and making it a critical first step in diagnosis and proper treatment. Come join ...

  • AHS Staffing

    Local Or Travel CT Technologist

    Found in: Jooble US O C2 - 5 days ago


    AHS Staffing Phoenix, AZ, United States

    AHS Staffing is seeking a travel CT Technologist for a travel job in Phoenix, Arizona. Job Description & Requirements Specialty: CT Technologist Discipline: Allied Health Professional Start Date: 04/08/2024 Duration: 13 weeks 36 hours per week Shift: 12 hours, days Employment Typ ...

  • Huen Electric

    BIM Specialist I

    Found in: Jobget US C2 - 6 days ago


    Huen Electric River Grove, IL, United States

    About the Role: The BIM (Building Information Modeling) Specialist will assist the Estimating and Operations teams to provide accurate drawings of new or existing electrical systems to be used in project acquisition efforts. · Company Overview · Huen Electric, Inc., a subsidiary ...