Zacharias 🐝 Voulgaris

With two different image viewers I tried, I get the following error: 
Error interpreting JPEG image file (Not a JPEG file: starts with 0x52 0x49)

So, I wouldn't blame the beBee editor for this, though it is still a bug. I wonder if these JPGs on pixabay are now coded with a new standard or something…

Good morning @Zacharias 🐝 Voulgaris , about this problem the technicians tell me that it does not always fail, but it has happened more times and we do not know why it happens.
We have added an additional check, to see if it does not happen any more, but we have not been able to reproduce the error. Can you please try again ? thanks ! CC @Alberto Landeras 

We looked at it. Let's see if we can find it and fix it. Thank you very much again for the information

Really strange how the article was published alright after I switched to a PNG version of the image. Same image though (the JPG one) was fine on another site. Also, that JPG was the one used on the actual pixabay site…

Tried it again using Chromium (an open-source alternative to Chrome) but no luck. Perhaps it's a JPG issue since this image, just like the image on the other article that gave me trouble, were both jpegs. In my other articles I've used PNGs…

No worries. I've saved the article as a draft so I can post it when the bug is fixed. BTW, I use Mozilla Firefox. I can also try a different browser to see if it's a browser-specific issue. Cheers

we will work on it ! many thanks again !!!

Sorry, I forgot that. Just sent it to you via a private message…